Sunday 19 June 2016

Appointment of Parliamentary Secretaries in Delhi - Birth of the problem child?

Who is a Parliamentary secretary?

A Parliamentary secretary is a member of a Parliament in the Westminster system, who assists a more senior minister with his or her duties. In several countries the position has been re-designated as assistant minister.

What happened in Delhi?

Arvind Kejiriwal appointed 21 Parliamentary secretaries to his cabinet, which already has 7 ministers.

What is the law?

         As per Article 239AA of the Constitution of India, The total number of ministers in the Council of Ministers in a Union Territory shall not exceed ten percent of the Total number of the members of the Legislative assembly.

         As per Article 191 of the Constitution of India, A person shall be disqualified for being chosen as member of Legislative assembly or Legislative council if, inter-alia, he hold an “Office of Profit” of the government.

         An “Office of Profit” is not defined in the Constitution of India. However, Judiciary has laid the following tests to constitute an “Office of Profit”:
o   Whether the government makes the appointment;
o   Whether the government has the right to remove or dismiss the holder;
o   Whether the government pays remuneration;
o   What the functions of the holder are; and
o   Does the government exercise any control over the performance of these functions.

How the row originated?

On 13th March, 2015, Kejiriwal passed an order for appointing 21 Parliamentary Secretaries, who are Cabinet Ministers. To prevent their appointment becoming invalid, he sought to amend the “Delhi Members of Legislative Assembly (Removal of the Disqualification) Act, 1997”. The amendment provides that the members shall be insulated from getting disqualified because of their holding of office of Parliamentary secretary on the grounds of holding an office of profit. It was forwarded by Lieutenant Governor of Delhi to the Centre, which in turn sent it to the President with its comments. The Union Home Ministry has said that Delhi cannot have more than ten percent of their total strength of the Legislative assembly, which is 70. Thus the Home Ministry has given its opinion that any appointment of more than 7 members in the cabinet is not tenable by law. The bill was challenged as unconstitutional by a Delhi lawyer Prashant Patel.

Current Status of the tussle

 The president has refused to give his assent and the issue was referred to the Election commission(EC) by the President, which is presently hearing the arguments of the Delhi government and the petitioner Prashant Patel. The EC is inquiring into the issue on two fronts:
1.      Is their appointment tenable in view of Article 239AA of the Constitution of India.
2.      Are the MLA-s not disqualified in view of Article 191 of the  Constitution of India.

Possible repercussion

If proven guilty, the 21 members will cease to be MLA-s causing considerable damage to the strength of AAP in the Legislative Assembly.

Sources: